Spivak, Reuter article: testing for hygienic behavior in honey bee colonies

What’s the bottom line?

Encourage good honey bee genetics in your apiary by raising queens from your strongest hives.

It seems obvious, but on the flip side, helping weak colonies ‘limp along’ with mite treatments and antibiotics is actually encouraging weak genetics among the bees, and strong genetics among the mites!  How do you test for hygienic behavior?  Read the article linked below to find out.

The varroa destructor mite causes all kinds of problems for the European honey bee.  In addition to weakening the colon directly, the mite acts as a vector of several viruses, notably the deformed wing virus.   Attempts to find insecticides specific enough to kill the mite, but not the bee have met with varied results.  Mites have also developed resistance to several pesticides that initially appeared to be effective while other treatments are harmful to human health and must not be used when bees are collecting nectar.

This ‘bandaid approach’ of annual treatments to knock down the weakest mites is only a short term solution, and one that ultimately weakens the gene pool of our regional honey bee population while strengthening that of the pest by ‘selecting’ for the strongest genes within the mites (the ones that survive the treatment).

The keys to controlling varroa mites lie with genetics.  It’s a genetic race, and with the mite’s life span so much shorter than the honey bee, there’s a greater opportunity for evolution by the mites when exposed to external pressures, like miticides.  This problem is compounded by the recessive, multi-gene activation of hygienic behavior in the honey bee, making it more challenging to improve their genetics.

This article by Marla Spivak and Gary Reuter from the University of Minnesota’s department of Entomology demonstrates a method for determining if your colonies have genetically driven hygienic traits, something which can be easily encouraged within your bee yard!

Encouraging hygienic traits has not been shown to have detrimental side effects, can reduce or eliminate the ‘need’ for mite or disease treatments, and benefits not only your bees but all the honey bees in your region.  Why not try using the honey bee’s natural cycles, and encourage good genetics to help control mite populations without the use of costly and dangerous synthetic or natural pesticides, many of which are just as toxic as their man-made counter parts?


A Sustainable Approach to Controlling Honey Bee Diseases and Varroa Mites

Coordinated effort to fix the broken US food system.

The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) has put together an impressive array of somewhat startling facts, and a road map to get us back on track to a sustainable healthy food system.

Check it out here:

National Honeybee Colony Loss figures for 2015

We track honeybee insect colony populations because they are a valuable monetary asset to humanity.  I’d venture to say that we know a lot about insects in general because of the honeybee.

The beeinformed partnership tracks colony loss, and this past year was a hard one:

Nation’s Beekeepers Lost 44 Percent of Bees in 2015-16

I’m all for helping this species of insect, not to mention all the other ‘wild’ pollinators out there that provide far more benefit to humanity than we may realize.  While I have no doubt that insecticides are negatively impacting our environment and health, it is important to keep things in perspective and look at facts before plotting a course of action.

Honeybee populations fluctuate a great deal due to the monetary value of what we can produce from them.  When there’s a demand for honey and bee products, bee populations increase.  “Cherry Picking” data to support any case can be a detrimental thing, and indeed if you look at honeybee population figures between 1946 and 2006, it looks like ‘bees are doomed’.  Expand those figures over a larger date range however, and, though we’re still on average losing bees, the doomsday scenario seems less likely.

Sick Bees Part 18F8: Colony Collapse Revisited – Beekeeping Economics

This is from a commercial beekeeper in California, and one who doesn’t seem to have a problem with proper use of insecticides.

Draw your own conclusions.  Its clear we have a log way to go to replenish natural, healthy, wild colony populations of the past, however through good breeding of pest resistant survivor stock, there’s hope that we can get those wild populations of honeybees back up in number.

Promising indicators for sustainable small farms

For a while there I was wondering if it was a realistic expectation to manage to make a living above the ‘poverty line’ as a small farmer.  Nearly content with the idea of joining the ‘wealthy-poor’ from the sheer satisfaction that can be gained as a farmer, I ran across a few articles that seem to indicate that with enough dedication, planning, and efficiency-minded protocols in place, it might very well be possible to put a kid through college and take a vacation from time to time with the profits from your farm I. E. small farming can be economically sustainable!

This example is truly inspiring (I can’t wait to see the documentary they have in progress):

His advice to ‘Grow Smarter, not Bigger’ really resonates.